Rock and Roll isn’t Dead, But It is Dying… Right in Front of Our Eyes

The WSJ has the data. As one generation slowly dies off, the next generation has no comparable stars to fill the void. The result? The disappearance of rock and roll as a cultural phenomenon. In other words, music is just not as important in the lives of the younger generation. We are witnessing the twilight of the rock gods:

David Bowie, Glenn Frey, Prince, Leonard Cohen, George Michael and Chuck Berry seem like a disproportionate number of superstars to lose in a short time span.

But with many of rock’s founding fathers and mothers reaching their 70s, the end of the age of rock ’n’ roll is just beginning. While every generation bemoans the passing of its great artists, the outsize influence of rock promises to have a profound impact on popular culture and overall music-industry sales.

Of the 25 artists with the highest record sales in the U.S. since 1991, when reliable data first became available, just one—Britney Spears—is under 40, Nielsen data show. Nineteen of the 25 are over 50 years old.

Boomer rock stars are in a league of their own, the products of an exploding record business that minted celebrities at a time when celebrity was less common. Rock’s heyday is hard to fathom: Unlike jazz and classical music, which became niche businesses after dominating mainstream pop culture, rock was the first musical genre to become a huge, multibillion-dollar global industry with staying power.

A confluence of technological, cultural and musical forces in the middle of the 20th century led to the modern pop/rock industry. Record players, a fixture in most American homes by the late 1960s, let America’s restive youth listen to music away from their parents.

Rock concerts went global and took over sports stadiums. The rise of mass media—especially television—enabled global celebrity.

Much of rock’s commercial success was possible because of the way the industry was structured. By the 1980s, cash-rich major labels were helping finance tours, throwing money at fledgling acts and investing huge sums in veteran stars even when their careers floundered.

Such investments—equivalent in spirit to the R&D expenditures of pharmaceutical firms—helped artists build enduring brands and transformed superstars into major corporations that overshadow young pop/rock acts even today.

Because of the multiplicity of entertainment options today, reduced attention spans, personalized tastes and less record-label support, most of today’s artists will never be as big as yesterday’s rockers.

Radio used to have the power to make even a lower-quality rock release popular. However, the fragmentation of the music industry—fans using multiple formats and splintering across rock, hip-hop, country and electronic music—means most acts will never find the same big audiences.

Younger fans have less cash to spend on traditional concerts, so they’re drawn to festivals, which provide a cost-effective way to see over 100 acts.

It’s unclear whether today’s younger touring juggernauts will, like the Rolling Stones, rake in more money when they’re older. “I can’t say Drake or Justin Bieber will be selling tickets 30 years from now,” says Gary Bongiovanni, Pollstar’s editor in chief. “There is not a lot of evidence showing that many younger acts are developing the staying power of the boomer bands,” he says.

2 thoughts on “Rock and Roll isn’t Dead, But It is Dying… Right in Front of Our Eyes

  1. Very TRUE post here My Friend!!! As the years roll by,the LESS I’m becoming attracted to “new” rock!!! Similar to favoring an OLD worn-out pair of jeans that you’ve had since high-school,over a new (and MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE pair)………as there’s really no comparison!!! New,undecided rock whom say,all THEIR “influences” were the SAME bands you grew UP with!?!? Or simply go BACK to your good ole pair of worn-out jeans!?!? But OMG……….do they fit OH SO RIGHT!!! Lol. 🙂


  2. Bryan Morey

    This article unfairly compares rock artists of the past to the crap pop artists of today. Of course no one will be listening to Beiber in 30 years – he sucks now and he’ll suck then. Good music will always be appreciated. There is garbage music from the 70s that was popular that no one listens to now.

    The article is correct though in its assessment of the current lack of huge rock stars, although some bands in the hard rock and metal genres are doing fairly well for themselves. Even Mike Portnoy, the caretaker of prog himself, is doing pretty well for himself. Even if our favorite rock bands never make it big, we will still enjoy the new music coming out. Sadly, da masses seem to eschew good music in favor of crap that won’t last. What I don’t understand is how the heck was good music actually popular and profitable in the late 60s / early 70s.

    Liked by 1 person


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s