Mark Hollis in Ecstasy, Live in 1986

In the spring of 1987, while browsing the new music at the Hammes Bookstore at the University of Notre Dame, I fortuitously came across an album called “The Colour of Spring” by a group I had previously dismissed as nothing more than a trendy New Wave band with the bizarre name of Talk Talk.

Though I knew next to nothing about Talk Talk or their music, I was quite taken with the cover, a James Marsh painting of a number of butterflies and moths with a variety of surreal designs on them.  Judging the album by its cover, I decided to take a chance and make a spontaneous purchase.

After a listen to “The Colour of Spring” back in my dorm room in Zahm Hall, I was a convinced Talk Talk fan, and I’ve been ever since.  Indeed, I’d never heard anything like the music or the lyrics.

In the opening track, Hollis sings with astounding conviction:

“Try to teach my children/To recognise excuse before it acts/From love & conviction to pray.”

In the concluding song, Hollis again brings in a religious theme–this time of the nature of evil, and the power of good to overcome it:

“As bad as bad becomes/It’s not a part of you/Contempt is ever breeding/Trapped in itself/Time it’s time to live”

With at least fifteen musicians and two choirs performing on the album, including Traffic’s venerable Steve Winwood, “The Colour of Spring” is complex, religious, and dramatic.  It was made by musicians who clearly love what they do and who enter into music as fully as humanly possible.  Even to this day, I feel chills when I hear the album.  It’s not lost any of its quality, even after twenty-two years.

Two years later, in the fall of 1988, when I was working at as a classical host and a rock DJ at WSND-FM, Talk Talk released its fourth album, “The Spirit of Eden.”  Now regarded as the foundation of the post-rock movement, the album might be one of the finest non-classical albums ever made.  Intense, moody, and deeply meaningful, the “Spirit of Eden” captures and propels the imagination for a little over a 40 minutes.  Costing an outrageous sum of money to produce, taking 14 months to make, and employing 16 musicians and a choir, the “Spirit of Eden” simply confused the music industry.

In a radio interview (available on the Talk Talk facebook page), Hollis acknowledged that the lyrics—based on the notion of creation and destruction, on the loss of real and traditional communities in the modern world, and on the disturbing absence of silence—have a profound meaning for him.  In the middle of the opening 18-minute song, Hollis sings:

“Summer bled of Eden/Easter’s heir uncrowns/Another destiny lies leeched upon the ground.”

Another song, “Wealth,” rewrites the famous “Prayer of St. Ignatius of Loyola.”

Talk Talk’s final album, “Laughing Stock,” has a similar feel to “Spirit of Eden,” in terms of music and lyrics.  On the fifth track, “New Grass,” Hollis sings:

“A hunger uncurbed by nature’s calling/Seven sacraments to song/Versed in Christ/Should strength desert me. . . . Lifted up/Reflected in returning love you sing/Heaven waits/Someday Christendom may come/Westward.”

*****

Photo from: http://skyarts.sky.com/talk-talk-live-at-montreux-1986

After twenty-two years, Talk Talk released its first live DVD.  Recorded July 11, 1986, in Montreaux, Switzerland,” the band—Mark Hollis, Lee Harris (drummer), Paul Webb (bassist), two keyboard players, and two percussionists—offers the small Swiss audience every single thing they have to offer over roughly 90 minutes.  The concert, consisting of 15 songs (fourteen listed, but the best song by far, the 1 minute 30-second long “Chameleon Day,” receives no official notice in the packaging) is nothing short of inspiring and heady, and the music—even the earlier poppier stuff such as “My Foolish Friend”—has an organic, impressionistic, jazzish, progressive feel.

Some songs unexpectedly come to life in fascinating ways, such as “Does Caroline Know,” a relatively weak studio cut.  In concert, though, it stuns and comes off as a progressive rock epic.

Every person on the stage seems to be enjoying himself immensely, each a professional and artist fully in sync with every other person.  Harris, especially, plays with such steady ferocity that I feared his drum kit might collapse during the concert.  It didn’t, and Harris played with passionate verve throughout.  He clearly holds the varied instruments and musicians into a centric and cohesive whole.

But, most importantly, Hollis sings as though he is standing before the court of God, afraid to squander any precious talent bestowed upon him.  As strange as this might read, he appears as though he is full ecstasy. I mean ecstasy in its original sense—not as something sexual, but as something divine.

He seems the perfect medieval saint, enraptured by the Divine.  There are moments during the concert when he walks back to a bench/seat in front of the drum kit and simply collapses.  Yet, even in these down moments, he is fully and completely one with the music, if his body movements, swayings, and motions are any indication of the state of his soul.  Indeed, from roughly the third song to the end, he seems to be completely immersed in the art and intensity of the music.

At the end of the concert, when Hollis says:  “Thank you very much.  Good night.  God bless.  Thank you very much,” he seems to mean every word of it.

Missing John Hughes

I have no idea if this is an American thing or not (and, quite possibly, a midwestern American thing at that), but I really miss movie maker John Hughes.  The man knew how to write, how to bring together immense talent, and how to promote good music.  After all, he brought together Steve Martin, John Cusack, Oingo Boingo, and Echo and the Bunnymen,

As we do every Thanksgiving break, the entire Birzer clan watched Home Alone.  We have every line and every crazy moment memorized.  But, we love it nonetheless.

As we finished the movie, I couldn’t help but think of some of my favorite John Hughes moments.

Who can really forget Ferris’s best line:  “It’s not that I condone fascism. . . or any ism for that matter.  Isms in my opinion are not good.  A person should not believe in an ism.  He should believe in himself.  I quote John Lennon.  ‘I don’t believe in Beatles, I just believe in me.’  A good point there.  After all, he was the walrus.”

Or, the main character of “She’s Having a Baby” fearing the death of his wife during child birth with Kate Bush’s “This Woman’s Work” playing over the scene?

Or, Farmer Ted  growing up a little too quickly in 16 Candles?

And, so many other scenes.

At the time (the mid 1980s), no two movies hit me as hard as The Killing Fields and The Breakfast Club.  Vastly different, of course, the former revealed the evils of totalitarianism.  The latter, though, expressed our anger at the both the Yuppies and the Hippies.  Each group had screwed up the world miserably, and we wanted to make our own way.  They’d divided us into convenient categories, and we rejected them.

And, the movie begins with a quote from David Bowie.

Hughes knew us very well.

 

Not So Jolly…

Amongst the many victims of Hurricane Sandy were the band JOLLY. These guys had been deep into the recording of their next album and were looking forward to a European tour next spring with Riverside – then the storm destroyed the home of drummer/producer Louis Abramson, along with most of their gear.

They are running an Indiegogo campaign to raise funds for gear replacement.

Massive Bereavement from Effloresce by Oceansize

I was first introduced to Oceansize a few years ago after reading a general review of progressive rock by a devout Catholic (a priest I think, not you Brad!). He discussed a number of albums produced over the last few years that had escaped me and I decided to take a chance on Effloresce.  I purchased the CD with no internet listening beforehand. At first I just didn’t get it; what was this all about? There were too many things going on for my brain to register. It literally blew my mind. I just couldn’t get my head around it. But after about 4 or 5 listens it hit me like a sledgehammer, but in a good way, where pain is pleasure. I have listened to this album so many times it’s stupid really…can one album be so good that I spend so much of my precious time listening to it? The whole album is like a massive earworm to me, I have trouble getting it out of my head after listening to it… trouble sleeping, you bet!

Of all the brilliant tracks on the album, I’ve chosen Massive Bereavement to comment upon because it includes so many of the elements of progressive music that I like.

  1. It’s long and it takes me on an emotional journey.
  2. It has multi-layered guitars (three of them), played in the usual complex time signatures. The guitar sound is dissonant, atonal and challenging but it’s also soft and melodic at times. It’s full of great little riffs without any noticeable solos. If someone can identify all the time signatures for me then I would appreciate it!
  3. It has some fantastic ‘off’ beat, syncopated drumming. The drum is another key instrument, it’s not just there to hold the beat together (thanks Nigel). It adds extra texture and complexity. In fact of all the many albums I’ve heard, Effloresce is my favourite for drumming.
  4. The structure is typical of a ‘prog’ song i.e. it’s typically unstructured in the traditional sense and you’re not quite sure what you are going to get next. It builds up slowly and carefully, slipping in and out of strangely hypnotic vocals. An unsettling interlude follows – the song almost ‘simmers’ before the tempo speeds up; more lyrics follow building up the tension before exploding into a frenzied vocal and concludes with an attack of manic, duelling guitars.
  5.  The mood of the song is at first hallucinatory; it has a dream-like quality that is also disturbing; there is a sense of foreboding. As the vocals kick-in, there’s a palpable sense of anxiety and related despair as if someone is trying to get somewhere but can’t. As if in a dream I feel disconnected from reality without the ability to control my circumstance. A sense of trying to understand someone or something but being unable to, then realising that whatever I am searching for is different from my expectation. This is the emotional state the song triggers in my mind and I cannot escape from it.
  6. The vocal style, its emotion, is in perfect harmony with the mood of the song. At times dream-like but also contemplative, despairing and finally, almost hysterical.
  7. Lyrical meaning – what is the song all about? – perhaps asking Mike Vennart, who wrote it, would be a good idea.  I’ve heard on one blog that it’s about the death of Bill Hicks, the American comedian who died tragically young and who (allegedly) the band admired. His comedy involved direct attacks on mainstream society, religion, politics, and consumerism. However, I’m not going to hypothesize. Musical lyrics, like most verse, can be interpreted in different ways. What I know is that the words resonate with me and this significantly adds to the song’s enjoyment. I leave it to the reader to listen carefully to the song and make of them as you will. (They are at the end of this review).
  8. I never tire hearing this song. Every time I listen to it I capture a little bit more of its essence.


I read one review saying that Oceansize are like Mogwai meeting Tool and indeed, there are similarities with both. I personally ‘connect’ with the Mogwai sound, Tool not so much, but I believe there is an extra level of musical complexity to Oceansize. I would recommend either a very, very good hi-fi system OR a very good set of headphones to gain maximum appreciation of the complex sound of the band. The ‘inner-ear’ experience is superb.

Massive Bereavement is a stunning track from an album full of exceptional tracks. It’s an awesome debut album and currently in my top 10 of all time. Please, if you haven’t heard them, check out their other three albums, Everyone Into Position, Frames and Self Preserved While the Bodies Float Up. I hope you won’t be disappointed.

Oceansize fit into the edgy, dark and heavy side of Prog but that’s just where I like to be. Intense stuff. Welcome to the dark side J

PS – Totally unrelated anecdote

Massive Bereavement is a superb warm up track for the gym. I’ve developed a special 10 min cycle routine for it. A low rpm start, gradually building up the power to an explosive intensity and climax (Yes I am slightly deranged!).


The Lyrics

Billy’s worries take control
All at once needing seething teething
Take one more

He is growing

And we were searching for a truth that was there all along
All those knowing little seeds would be the words to this song
That righteous indignation dollar turning you on
Turn off the television turn off the television
All at once needing seething teething
Take one more

He is growing as god looks on
He is growing, god looks on, god looks on
What a way to go i’m still running for that bus that we missed years ago
A perfect antidote more connections made it’s inevitable
That he was reaching out to touch me he was reaching out to touch me he was
He was reaching out to touch me he was reaching out to touch me he was Reaching out

He’s not joking joking joking

Indelible an ever-changing colour you winner man
He’s invincible and screaming at the world that you’re wrong you’re so wrong
And i was reaching out to touch him i was reaching out to touch him i was
I was reaching out to touch him i was reaching out to touch him i was Reaching out

I’m not joking joking joking
Is this not what you expected
Is this not what you expected
Is this not what you expected
Is this not what you expected
Ah ah ah ah

David Longdon’s Wild River

David Longdon, Wild River (2004)

Those of us who grew up in the era of 70s rock remember a time when American FM stations played everything under the sun, and didn’t bother too much with categories, straight-ahead, punk, progressive, or otherwise.  There wasn’t really a point, because whether it was Buddy Holly one moment or Yes the next, it just all kind of got lumped together as rock — a young art, then, with lots of potential.  I think this achieved a certain illumination in those of us tuned in, to the potential of finding complex worlds even in the simplest of songs, and fresh air in a 12-minute time-changing epic.  There’s a lot of discussion on Progarchy, veiled and explicit, about what prog is.  This is as it should be, because there are so many reasons for why music achieves progressiveness.  It can be a splatter-art dionysian revelry or a heavily-mannered architecture, but it is the intention that is perhaps similar in the various executions of the art, and why, as I mentioned in another review, prog is riskier, more failure-prone, than, say, old time music or country blues or punk.  It is duty-bound to ‘prog’-ress.

I believe one of the ironies of the story of progressive rock is its oft-pointed-to golden period, roughly the early- and mid-70s, when the storied and hairy pioneers of the genre rolled in semi-trucks over the land, painting broad swaths of sidelong vinyl canvas with twiddly squonks and noodly solos, periodically emerging with a real gem that actually sold respectable numbers of triple gatefolds.  Genesis, King Crimson, Yes, Supertramp, Rush, Barclay James Harvest, those semi-truckers ELP, and the hosts of second stringers who got enough traction with either the freakout crowd (Hawkwind, Gong) or the Middle Earthers (Uriah Heep, Gentle Giant) to keep working bands out on the road for decades longer than anyone would imagine.  Then, chapter two, punk raises its head, and the proggers flee their patch bays for the comfort of (often very good, and often quite proggishly weird) new wave pop, digestible without having to get up for a pee mid-song.  Yup.  For every Foxtrot there are thousands of copies of Abacab, for every Close to the Edge there are bins-full of 90125.  Shall I enumerate the ratios for Rush and Supertramp, too, to this crowd? I think not.  You hear me.  This eventuality was not a bad thing — the proggers were striving to keep their muse alive in an era of undeniably important cultural change — and I think it by and large says a lot about the survival instincts and musicianship of the first-stringers.  Yes, I will always wish Rush had another “Xanadu” in them, but am also glad they figured out how to edit.  Now to the irony:  the prog “revival” tends to focus on the lengthy suites favored by the hairy period of prog, rather than the pop songcraft that came with short back and sides.

David Longdon’s record Wild River fits into the song-driven, streamlined version of progressive rock circa 1980.  Not to say it’s retrograde, but rather that it is essentially a pop record with a prog pedigree.  Longdon, who joined Big Big Train as vocalist in 2009, has a vocal timbre very close to Phil Collins and Peter Gabriel, and in fact worked with Genesis as a possible replacement for Collins in the early aughts.  He did better finding Big Big Train, I think, and Genesis probably did worse in not choosing him.  In the interim, Longdon produced 2004’s Wild River, a lovely collection of succinct tunes that I find expressive and joyful, light (as in luminous), and full of the twists and turns that should keep close listeners tuned in.

“Always” opens the record with a briskly fingerpicked guitar, bass, and drums, and a nice Hammond organ.  Longdon’s vocal is fluid, jazzier than his closest comparisons Gabriel/Collins, and the song has “hit” written all over it.  It is like Seal’s best work, and is also reminiscent of that period in the early 90s when the pendulum was swinging from both grunge and synth pop to a more organic sound championed by producers like T. Bone Burnett.  The balance of the record lives up to these set expectations, with an earthy, upbeat acoustic approach brightening the songs.  The sex romp of “Honey Trap” is fun, nice and hooky, darkened by the mixed emotions of the narrator.  “Mandy” is where the mandolin kicks in (Mandy/mandolin?), but there is no forced quaint-ization because of it; flanked by organ, drums, and electric guitar, with a ska section in the chorus, it actually works. That said, a mandolin and an English singer always makes me think of the venerable and much-missed Ronnie Lane, who knew himself how to work these elements, and who I could see singing the hell out of this song.  Thankfully, Longdon does this himself, doing justice to a tune about, as far as I can tell, the politics of relationships (nothing new, but effectively and hazily wrought).  Here’s the thing: I’m one of those listeners who discerns the lyrics last — I’m just much more interested in how a song’s layers and textures fit together.  I listened to this song about five times and until I wrote this review I didn’t care what the lyrics were about, it’s just a great tune, where the vocal is another instrument.  Which is why I knew I was going to like this record.  It works as a musical piece first, and the lyrics work as lyrics should, a combination of poetry, narrative, and tune.  It’s a master working who can take a line like “You decide, my feet are on the ground,” and shape it to a melodic hook.  “About Time” adds strings and a creeping dissonance, again with a short ska section in the chorus (and again effectively done — this is not a worn device).  While comparisons fall short, I see a certain Nick Drake angle working here, with Bryan Ferry looking on.  The Englishness, in other words, is more than apparent, but that’s what this music is, and it works.  “Vertigo” boasts the line, “Vertigo, look out below, all my surroundings are spinning around, must be the masochist in me that wants another chance.”  I find this compelling rather than precious, and the arrangement is so variegated that I’m shaking my head:  this is a pop tune.  Broadway should be knocking at Longdon’s door, but he’s better than that, I think.  His are not vocal gymnastics for the sake of impressive technique.  He serves his songs.  And that’s perhaps what makes this album transcend.  To reference Bryan Ferry again, Longdon has the similar ability to create a soundscape that centers on his vocal but doesn’t depend on it solely.  The mid-paced title track sets the tone for the record and is its literal centrepiece.  “Life is a wild river, not a low cut stream, and I need to believe, I need to hang on, to hold on to someone,” Longdon sings, his British R&B working a ground often neglected since the death of Dusty Springfield.  It works as the album’s middle piece, and the followup track, “Loving and Giving,” is reflective, slowing the pace further.  But with “In Essence” the valley is crossed, the ground rises and the pace picks back up.  This is album crafting, and “This House” rocks out, harmonica hitting a soul note with a bullet mic vocal treatment and dirty guitar giving the lie to wallowing in one’s self-pity.  “This house doesn’t feel like a home anymore” might read like a pop-psych platitude, but Longdon sings it like the universal sentiment it can be, tapping into a commonality we can all relate to.  “Joely” goes to guitar and string quartet, with a hoedown fiddle, profiling what I imagine is a young woman whose life has gotten away from her:  “Joely, the world’s your oyster, Take a knife, open the shell, and sever the creature.” How can this sound so good? But it does. Progress. And then the spoken poem at the end….  Poetry. Narrative. Tune.  “Falling Down” follows, with a rubbery bass and a Gabriel-esque delivery, balances holding on to the past with working towards the future.  This may be the mate to “Wild River,” urging onward in the face of history — “I can’t say I’m not dissapointed,” Longdon sings, and I don’t know about you, but I can relate to this some of the time — dashed expectations happen, they don’t have to define our lives, but they’re there.  The final track, “On to the Headland,” is an optimistic last salvo, solo guitar and voice.  Lighters up, please.  We’re moving forward, damn the torpedoes.

I really like this record and I’ll be presumptuous and say you should too.  But be prepared to only find it on Big Big Train’s site.  Not on iTunes, not at Amazon, not at Emusic.  What the ?#@>????  There is no reason on earth this shouldn’t be out there.  N.B. David Longdon and BBT:  give it up, proggers. Great records deserve a listen.

[David’s album, Wild River, can be ordered here.]

A wonderful album ……

Image

 

The Rumour Cubes – The Narrow State 

A simply tremendous little album that will blow you away if you like sweeping crescendos of violins building up into a wall of noise with spine-tingling effect then being thumped right in the chest with the most amazing spoken word section of The Gove Curve :

 Cold white fish, on wood beneath a river

Fast right schools bleed silver

Contract, bend stab bend

Touch on light on scales

They divest and vie patterns

On tiers of municipal glass

“The money follows the child”

Attend to the fish bone

The slim neck

Crooked hush

A down, put down handle

Stab in the dark

In a film handle

An old black phone “what ?”

For this one is the Gove Curve

No, this one is the Gove Curve

The river, the silt

Smoothed cling film

Gutted gape of rock

Where guts slip

Deep

Red

Oak grain

The State is narrow and you are basically gone

Gone all bone scuba

It is in the varnished fucking floor

Your face a rut around us

Build to up crinckle shine

Like the winds that hurt us

On Mars

float perfectly sad leaf,

float bight fresh green

fold

feathers torn the dead wing

sunk in the wreath boat

sunk in fine claps of copper flame

orange and green flecks

silent carnival

blinkless

eyes …..

 

Rumour Cubes are a 6-piece ensemble from London who’s music captivated me the first time I heard it with their EP ‘We Have Sound Houses Also”.

With wonderful titles such as “The University is a Factory”, “Triptych” and ‘Tempus Fugit” it might be easy to dismiss this as an art-house fancy by some bright young student types – but it goes way beyond that and has a real depth suggesting some true talent at work here.

That they play instruments well is beyond doubt – many aspiring bands can play perfectly well – but Rumour Cubes blend this with a marvellously cinematic sound borrowing cues from the likes of the aforesaid Mono, with hints of Sigur Ros and Explosions in the Sky but all the while managing to sound like, well, The Rumour Cubes.

 A fantastic discovery and well worth your attention.

 

 

 

 

 

Detailed review: “Citizens of Hope and Glory: The Story of Progressive Rock”

Citizens of Hope and Glory: The Story of Progressive Rock (Amberley Publishing, 2012) by Stephen Lambe

Ten years ago, my wife and I had the pleasure of spending a day in Belize as part of a week-long Caribbean cruise. Our tour guide, oddly enough, was from Germany; he and his family had moved to Belize some twenty years prior. I’ve never been a tour guide, but I assume it must be challenging in many ways: dealing with difficult and clueless tourists, recounting the same information again and again, trying to find the right combination of being informative and entertaining, and being the leader of the tour while not making the tour about yourself, but about the country, the culture, and the sites. This tour guide was exceptional: he was informative and detailed without being obsessive about every nook and cranny; he had a passion for his adopted homeland but also a knowing sense of objectivity; he mixed together trivia and humor and history with ease; he helped us experience Belize with the knowledge that we were in capable hands. It made for a delightful day.

Stephen Lambe, author of the recently published book, Citizens of Hope and Glory: The Story of Progressive Rock, reminds me of that tour guide. Now fifty years old, Lambe is something of a late-comer to prog, although he states so with a certain British dryness. He begins with with a wink and wry sigh: “To my constant irritation, I missed it. I was born in 1962, so by the time I had had my Prog epiphany in 1978 it was all over.” Only two sentences in and you have a nice phrase to insert into your next musical conversation: “Prog epiphany”. Lambe recounts how hearing the 1971 Yes album, Fragile, “blew my mind”; that was in 1978, as punk was rudely clawing and pawing its way onto the musical throne, albeit briefly.

And so the tour begins, with Lambe making it quite clear from the start what he hopes to accomplish—and what he will not try to do, for this or that good reason. It’s a small thing, but also significant. Having written a couple of books myself (and trying to finish a couple more at the moment), I think certain books—especially non-fiction works intended to educate and inform on a particular topic—should state from the start what they will and will not do. Lambe’s book is the third book I’ve bought that is dedicated solely to prog music. And, without naming the other two, I’ll simply note that this is the first of the three to be straight up about what the reader will find between the covers. (The other two are collections of essays, and are more academic in tone; they are mixed bags at best.)

What parameters does Lambe set? First, he focuses mostly on “symphonic” prog groups, with some mention of progressive metal, electronic music, and certain pop/rock groups, such as Talk Talk, XTC, Kate Bush, Tears for Fears, Elbow, and Radiohead, that have embraced many elements of prog without themselves being or becoming prog. Secondly, Lambe uses almost no quotes from either musicians or other publications. “I have chosen”, he states, “to make this book a personal history … in the hope that my experience and opinions will strike a chord with other fans of the genre. This book contains fact and opinion. … In the end this is a history of Progressive Rock filtered through my own tastes and experiences and I hope it is all the better for that.”

Some readers might be put off by such a statement, and I can appreciate their concerns. Lambe the tourist guide has spent over thirty years living in the land of Prog, and he has definite opinions about the sights and sounds therein. Personally, I like the approach. It reminds me of the similar tack taken by the exceptional American music critic, Will Friedwald (just a year old than Lambe, by the way), whose books on Sinatra and other popular and jazz singers from the early and mid-twentieth century are opinionated, informative, occasional quirky, often humorous, and never dull. Granted, Lambe is not the writer Friedwald is—but few people are. But Lambe, like Friedwald, is both knowledgeable and reasonable; he has his preferences, but he never pontificates, lambasts, or chides. On the contrary, he is agreeably positive; his occasional criticisms are almost always along the lines of noting that Album B is simply not quite as good as Album A by the same artist—and here are some reasons why.

Third, Lambe points out that since he is English, he tends to focus on artists from the UK, especially when he writes about the 1970s. Fair enough, especially since England in the 1970s was the center of the prog universe. The book is a chronological history; it does not try to be cute and jump around needlessly. Over the course of the book’s ten chapters, Lambe highlights about sixty essential prog albums, what he calls “pivotal albums”. These are not necessarily the “best” prog albums, he takes pains to note, but are a good, solid start to any prog library. Groups that receive substantial attention from the ’70s include Yes, Genesis, King Crimson, Gentle Giant, and Emerson, Lake and Palmer. Later groups include Marillion, The Enid, Twelfth Night, Rush, Magnum, Dream Theater, and Porcupine Tree, among many others. Due attention is given to American and European bands, including groups from Poland, Italy, and Germany.

Lambe is at his best when he makes connections, highlights influences, shares his personal experiences, and places bands and albums within both immediate and larger contexts. Here is a good example of his approach, about halfway into the book, in the chapter, “The 1980s: A Short-Lived Revival”:

Much more of a surprise than the last gasp of Yes was the seemingly sudden emergence of King Crimson. Towards the end of the 1970s, Robert Fripp had been increasingly active. This included an excellent solo album, Exposure, and work with Daryll Hall, Peter Gabriel and his own band, The League of Gentlemen. Working largely in the USA, he had managed to re-invent himself as a pioneer of the New Wave rather than a Progressive Rock dinosaur. In 1980, he set about forming a new band.

This time, Fripp had a different style of music in mind, something informed by the post-punk pop of Talking Heads (from which band he stole innovative guitarist and vocalist Adrian Belew), the intricate minimalism of Steve Reich and the rhythmic complexity of the old King Crimson. With a rhythm section comprising Tony Levin (on bass and the strange Chapman Stick) and Bill Bruford (drums), the band began rehearsing in Britain before taking a short set on tour in small British venues. I caught this tour at Keele University and was very impressed, although despite playing Crimson classics ‘Red’ and ‘Larks Tongues in Aspic’, they had less an hour’s worth of material. They were called Disciples at that point, although it was no surprise when they changed their name to King Crimson.

The resultant album, with its striking, minimalist cover, is a masterwork. It mixes Talking Heads-style vocals and song structures with a Prog style that few people had heard before. Belew sounds like he is having a whale of a time, his vocals clearly heavily influenced by David Byrne of his former band, but his melodic sense superbly utilized. His inventive guitar playing dips in and out of Fripp’s more intricate patterns. Bruford and Levin sound like they were born to play this music, with Levin’s intricate and inventive Chapman Stick work particularly impressive. But Fripp was the boss, and his remarkable guitar patterns are what make Discipline so memorable.

Of the ten chapters, six are devoted to history, groups, and albums; the other four are about the important relationship between technology and prog, the various aspects of live performances, prog art and design, and the content of prog lyrics. I would have preferred, if push came to shove, for the latter four to have been grouped together as the second part of the book rather than be dispersed among the historical chapters, where they break up the narrative flow. As it was, I skimmed some of those four chapters; however, I’ve no doubt they will prove informative to readers interested in those specific topics, especially musicians, producers, and others actually involved in creating music. The Epilogue, “Darlings of the Press at Last?”, notes that “Progressive Rock is a specialist genre once again, with an aging audience. However, the success of Porcupine Tree, Dream Theater and Elbow should give us all hope. Wherever there are people are willing to put in a little work to get more than a catchy tune and a trite lyric out of music, then Progressive Rock, in some form, has some hope for survival.” I suspect that most of the contributors and readers of Progarchy.com agree completely.

Lambe’s book is, I think, a near perfect introduction to progressive rock for nearly anyone interested in the topic. Passionate, obsessive prog fans who have spent years reading and collecting and communicating may find it a bit “101” at times. But even they will likely appreciate how Lambe has put together a cohesive narrative that makes many connections and fills in many holes without losing sight of the forest for the trees. This is a tour worthy taking, with a very adept and enjoyable tour guide. Highly recommended.

A Look At The Lyrics: Ocean Cloud

One of prog’s many attractions is its willingness to tackle unusual or obscure subject matter, and to do so via a lengthy piece of music if the subject is difficult or complex enough to demand it. Not that there’s anything wrong with 3-minute ballads, you understand. But an album consisting solely of short songs about love, lust and relationships can end up sounding a little… well… repetitive.

Marillion’s Ocean Cloud, an 18-minute piece from their acclaimed 2004 album Marbles, is an excellent example of the ‘long song on an unusual subject’ format. The subject in question is a man who is rowing single-handed across the Atlantic Ocean.

A song about rowing? Really?

It’s a testament to Steve Hogarth’s skill as a lyricist that he is able to tease something interesting from such an apparently unpromising starting point. In fact, there are many questions that can be explored here. What is the attraction of such a lonely and dangerous activity? What is the rower trying to prove, and to whom? What is he running away from?

The mournful first line, sung over the sound of waves and seagulls’ cries, immediately sets the tone:

He’s seen too much of life and there’s no going back.

Already, we are being asked to think of this as an escape, an act with a certain finality to it. Hogarth allows this line to stand alone; the first verse doesn’t begin properly until after a few bars of Steve Rothery’s haunting guitar, and it opens with

The loneliness calls him, and the edge which must be sharpened.

Hogarth wants us to recognise the seductive nature of being alone with one’s thoughts; moreover, he highlights the idea that danger can be attractive – the old cliché that you will never feel more alive than when you are putting yourself in harm’s way, ‘sharpening that edge’.

The second verse is, I think, my favourite:

The smell of the earth is his favourite smell
But he’s somehow compelled to the stinging salt hell,
To the place where he hurts and he’s scared,
And there’s no one to tell, and no one who doesn’t listen.

Despite the comforting familiarity of land, the call of the wild ocean is impossible to resist. He will face pain, fear and loneliness – but is being in the middle of that vast expanse of water any more lonely than being with someone “who doesn’t listen”?

Later, the mood changes and the tone becomes defiant:

Only me and the sea
We will do as we please

The defiance soon fades as the song enters its quieter middle section, the calm before the storm. Then the ‘black wall of water’ hits and a flashback reveals what the rower is trying to prove by his mad heroism:

He remembers the day he was marched to the front
By the physical knuckle-head teacher of Games.
“Look lads,” he declared, “this boy’s a cream puff,”
“No guts and no muscles, no spine and no stuffing!”
The whole schoolroom sniggered
And silently thanked God it wasn’t them…

Hogarth spins a positive outcome from this horrible memory, letting us know that the rower is the ultimate victor: that he has proven himself more successful – more of a man, even – than those who once belittled him so cruelly:

But time is revenge, all the bullies grow weak
And must live with faithless women who despise them.

The reminiscence becomes more wistful as the rower reflects on past loves before rejecting these thoughts, declaring

Don’t want to remember when I was alive

And what better way to banish painful memories than to immerse yourself in the physical demands of the challenge?

Watch me, watch me
Paint this picture,
Stretching, cursing, hurting,
Watch me taking it

Before a final chorus ends the song, the last verse captures the seductiveness of ‘perfect solitude’, achievable only by destroying that last means of contact with civilisation:

Between two planets
In the black daylight of space.
Between two heavenly bodies,
The invisible man.
Ripping out the radio; I want to be alone…

You can view a live performance of Ocean Cloud from 2009 here:

Norwegian Visions of Purgation: The Eddas of Gazpacho

[Progarchists, I published a version of this about six months ago, but I’ve revised it significantly since then.  I’m also very much desirous of celebrating the re-release and bettering of a must-own (YES, a MUST-OWN ALBUM) album, “Night.”  I honestly didn’t think this album could get any better.  And, just to be clear, I rank it somewhere in my top ten albums of all time.]

Little things that make up her life

Watching them pick winners with her standing by

She read a tired pamphlet by a fire-starting freak

Campbell’s ice cubes, the drinks are unique!

But everything is cool as long as you dare

To bend a few taboos, to sacrifice pawns

Pockets filling up with gold

From the shades of his soul

Lost in the panic that she typewrote

Of lightbulbs that burn out in rain

And he saw his wife to be in someone

But she couldn’t see and she never cared

How small is your life

Is it too small to notice?

–Gazpacho, “Valerie’s Friend” (2007)

Nearly six years ago, I finally listened to a band I’d avoided for over half of a decade. Having been a part of various prog newsgroups (the “National Midnight Star” was the greatest of these in the 1990s), news feeds, and websites for the entirety of my adult life, I’d come across the name of Gazpacho numerous times, and the mention was always in a positive context.

For reasons which now elude me, I kept putting off purchasing one of their cds. I even consider their original patrons, Marillion, one of my favorite bands, and I have for nearly two decades now.

Still, even the praise and promotion of Gazpacho by Marillion didn’t convince me.  From my poor memory, I was a bit turned off by the name, and I’d assumed they were merely a Marillion cover band and tribute band.  “Gazpacho” is the name of one of Marillion’s songs from their album, “Afraid of Sunlight” (1995).

Then, almost half a decade ago, a friend I trust explicitly told me I had (yes, HAD) to listen to the latest album, “Night,” a single 53-minute song broken into five parts.  It’s as much a suite as it is a song.

Well, I’m certainly a huge fan of concept albums and albums without any breaks in the music. To me, if something is worth saying, it generally takes much longer than the traditional 3-minute pop song allows. As I posted here recently, the only real flaw in The Cure’s 1989 “Disintegration” is the few seconds of silence between songs.

But, 53 minutes?

Was this too good to be true?  Seemingly so. This would be akin to complaining to Costco that their 56lbs. (yes, I exaggerate. I think it’s 5 lbs., 6 ounces–but it’s huge and glorious!) of M&Ms for $8 isn’t enough.

Asking for more would just be sheer decadence and would probably require a quick jog down to the confessional at church.

With the prompting of my friend and my eagerness to hear a 53-minute song, I purchased “Night.”  To say this changed my life would be too much. To say it reshaped my taste in music and set my listening standards to a new level would not be an exaggeration in the least.  I was just on the verge of discovering Big Big Train at the moment I first listened to “Night,” and I think Gazpacho raised my understanding of what’s possible in music to a very high height.

“Night” is, to my thinking, a proper successor to Talk Talk’s “Spirit of Eden.”  Musically, there are certainly similarities, and I’d be rather shocked to learn that the shadow of Mark Hollis, Tim-Friese-Greene, and Phill Brown did not over over the work of Gazpacho.  Indeed, Talk Talk seems much more of a direct influence than does Marillion despite the name of the band.

“Night” has been in constant listening rotation now for as long as I’ve owned it, and I’ve never once gotten tired of it or felt I’d actually reached and understood it in all of its depth and breadth. As I’m listening to it now, writing this review, it’s almost as fresh to me as it was on the first listen or whatever number of listens yesterday’s was.

[I’m revising this article (November 21, 2012), which I first wrote about six months ago.  As I’m revising, I’m listening to it yet again–it’s just stunning.  So stunning, in fact, that heart is actually skipping a few beats.  No, unlike with the 56 lbs. bag of M&Ms mentioned above, I’m not exaggerating.]

“Night,” for me, ranks up with the greatest post-classical albums of all time. Indeed, it’s in a league with “Close to the Edge,” “Selling England by the Pound,” “Grace Under Pressure,” “Hounds of Love,” “Ocean Rain,” “Skylarking,” “Spirit of Eden,” “Disintegration,” “Brave,” and “The Underfall Yard.”

From the first listen of “Night,” I was hooked. The piano, the violin, the voice, the bass, the drums, the guitar–everything just fits, and it does so beautifully. It also does so as an organic whole, one note and one idea leading mysteriously, yet perfectly, to the next.

I knew fully well upon the first few moments of listening to “Night” that I would have to become a Gazpacho completist. My prediction has come true, and I rather proudly own their seven studio cds and two live ones.

Rare for me, I even purchased the new re-release of “Night” from Kscope, despite already owning the original.  The new version comes with new artwork and typically beautiful Kscope packaging, but it also has new drums, a few new parts, and three of the five parts of “Night” recorded life.

And, did I mention the lyrics? These guys know how to write, and they know how to integrate the lyrics with the music and the music with the lyrics into something profoundly and seamlessly whole and good.

Despite its brilliant intensity, the album seems to come to a fitting denouement at around forty minutes into it, when Jan-Henrik Ohme sings one of the best and most haunting lines in all of rock music: “St. John got gunned down with a cold 38.” My mind reels every time I hear this. Am I in Norway, on the island of Patmos, or in some twilight realm of progressive/art rock bliss?

And, so, I’ve concluded, listening to a Gazpacho album is akin to every poetic description of purgatory I’ve ever encountered. It’s not the perfection of heaven, but it’s also not the twilight and long defeat of this earth, or, in any way, the pains of hell.

A Gazpacho album is purgatory in the best sense: a journey toward perfection, offering brief glimpses of the most beautiful things possible, reaching for that which the Platonic Celestial King reached: the Good, the True, and the Beautiful.

For those of you have had the blessing of reading Dante’s Divine Comedy, you know exactly what I mean.  No scene in literature touches me as much as Dante realizing he has escaped the Inferno and found himself staring at the stars of Purgatory.  Listening to this album is akin to this.

The touch of its hand is memory

A kiss to lead the blind

In water I hear slamming of doors

St.Christopher beneath the rocks

An empty dream of summer fields of daisies

Perfect endings

–Gazpacho, “River” (2010)

Gazpacho-esque Eddas

Despite the name, Gazpacho hails from the glorious northern Kingdom of Norway, home of many, many good and meaningful things, including one of the finest writers to ever grace this earth, Sigrid Undset, and one of the kings who actually gives monarchy a fine name, the courageous Haakon VII.

Oh, and let’s not forget, some of the best stories (the Sagas and myths) ever written come from this land as well.

Sadly, I’ve only visited once, and that was way back in 1988. Still, the memories of the intense and stark beauty of the Norwegian landscape inspire me to this day, and I happily keep a map of Scandinavia (dated 1815) framed above my desk as a reminder of what wonders can exist in creation.  Could I travel anywhere in the world at the moment, my first choice would be Norway and Sweden.

Interestingly, though we always associate the word with the Scandinavian mythic tradition, “Edda” is one of the most debated words in the history of Europe. No one is exactly sure of its etymology, but it’s generally agreed that it means “a soulful utterance” and is applied almost exclusively to northern myth. Whatever its history, it’s a stunning word, and the peoples of northern Europe (as the great English author and scholar, J.R.R. Tolkien, knew well) should be proud of it as an immense part of their cultural traditions.

Indeed, northern mythology is every bit as interesting, as complicated, and as developed as classical Mediterranean mythology. There are, understandably, similarities between the two polytheistic systems, but there’s a nobility and a will found in northern myth that is missing in the much more rationalistic and abstract realm of classical myth.

Whether the members of Gazpacho have intentionally embraced this northern Eddic tradition or not, it certainly seems to be in their very blood.

Formed in 1996 by Jon-Arne Vilbo, Thomas Anderson, and Jan-Henrick Ohme, Gazpacho has now released seven studio albums (recently adopted by Kscope Records) and two live releases. The seven studio: Bravo (2003); When Earth Lets Go (2004); Firebird (2005); Night (2007); Tick Tock (2009); Miss Antropos (2010); and March of Ghosts (2012). Each release is a delight, and while I find myself drawn back to “Night” more than the others, this is no small praise, and I find myself liking everything these men have produced.

Broken glass

The plan has failed

The silence knows

A man of faith

Everything that he knows, what a layman will do for diamonds

Fell on his knees gave in to sad overload

And all of the survivors shamed in the trench

Scrape up what’s left of his soul

Of his soul, of his soul

–Gazpacho, “Tick Tock” (2009)

Daughter of Night or of Zeus: Either way, mischief.

While the albums prior to “Night” are certainly artful and progressive, they are not part of a greater concept.

After “Night”, though, Gazpacho has produced three concept albums, each as progressive as progressive can possibly get. “Tick Tock” (2009) follows the story of a downed French pilot, trying to make it safety back to civilization in 1935. A number of separate stories comprise Gazpacho’s latest album, this year’s “March of Ghosts.” In a sense, at least thematically, this album best represents the very purgatorial idea of Gazpacho, literally following the souls of a variety of those who have passed from this existence.

Rather humorously (yes, I laughed for probably ten minutes solid), the lead singer describes his own theological beliefs on his Facebook page as “Frisbeetarianism”–the belief first proposed by comedian George Carlin that at death, the soul “goes upon a roof and gets stuck.”   Admittedly, I’m a Roman Catholic.  A pretty bad one, frankly.  But, I love the idea of Frisbeetarianism.

With “March of Ghosts,” however, the restlessness of souls pervades the album. I live across the street from a very large nineteenth-century graveyard, and, in ways I could never describe, “March of Ghosts” fits perfectly with the sense one gets walking around the cemetery at any time of the day or night. There are haunted and restless feelings present, but there’s also a calm that really can be found no where else but in a cemetery and, maybe, on a Gazpacho album.

As much as I love the driving qualities of “Tick Tock” and the pervasive certain uncertainties of “March of Ghosts,” I find their 2010 album, “Missa Atropos” the most interesting and most daring of their post-“Night’ concept albums.

The story of Gazpacho’s “Missa Atropos” is exactly what the title states: a Mass written for one of the three Fates. Little recorded remains of her. A quick glance at Hesiod’s Theogony reveals only a conflicting story. In the same work, Hesiod claims that she is one of the seven children of Zeus and Themis, the god’s second wife (Lines 901-906), as well as the offspring (alone; no father) of the horrific Night (Lines 217-219). In each version, however, Hesiod recorded that the Fates determined what good and what evil should be given to every man.

The protagonist of Gazpacho’s story, however, struggles to accomplish the writing and completion of a Mass. To write it, he disappears into the solitude of a light house. The conflicting ironies in Gazpacho’s story are simply brilliant. A “Mass” is meant to be a communal celebration, and a lighthouse is meant to aid those who cannot see clearly. Here, a man turns away from the world in a project to connect this world to the next, thus bridging the horizon with the heavens. By residing in a light house, he also guides the desperate to a safe haven, a port, thus bridging chaos and order. But, he also writes a Mass to appease the Fate–who, by definition, should be unappeasable–and thus bridges determinism with free will.

Struck down in the middle of

a little life

Star spangled by the wayside

As the trains roll by

Mercy, what can you do?

Try to be a saint?

Leaving cannot heal you

First try it with a kiss.

–Gazpacho, “Black Lily” (2012)

Summa Gazpacho-ia

If you’ve had the opportunity to listen to the beauty that is Gazpacho’s music, none of the above matters much–you already know exactly what I’m trying to write, and probably in a better fashion that I can communicate.

If you’ve not had the opportunity to listen to Gazpacho’s music, well, I’m incredibly jealous. I’d give a lot to be able to listen to them again for the first time–it would be an experience akin to reading Eliot’s “Four Quartets” or Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings for the first time, again.

Those first times are intensely precious.

Yet, as with Eliot and Tolkien, each new listen of Gazpacho reveals even more depth and more width and more breadth. As with Eliot and Tolkien, I’m sure I’ve not comprehended it all yet, not matter how many times I’ve heard or read.

I’ve yet to hear a note or a lyric by Gazpacho that is out of place. While everything they do is unpredictable, it’s never chaos; it’s always justice and harmony–but arrived at through the most artful of ways.

So, yes, Gazpacho’s music is brilliant, stunning, shattering, and healing. It is, truly, in the most Dante-esque sense, purgatorial, a purging of our imperfections through fire, and a reaching, searching journey toward all that is perfect.

After Summa

Please take my advice.  This is a MUST OWN (yes, I’m shouting at you!) album.  In the U.S., Amazon.com has it for $4.95!  What in the world?  Well, take advantage of it.  I can’t be held responsible for what happens after.  If you have any love of music–and how would you have made it through nearly 2,500 words if you didn’t???–you will end up purchasing all of Gazpacho’s releases.  Along with Big Big Train Matt Stevens, and The Reasoning, these are the absolute leaders of the new movement and embracing of progressive rock.

The official Gazpacho website is here.

Scam involving The Enid. Beware.

Dear Bradley,

SOMETHING SHABBY THIS WAY COMES?

ewcd03 390x390INNER SANCTUM IN ANOTHER REPACKAGING SCAM?

If past releases by these Tin Pan Alley scumbags purporting to be something special are anything to go by, this latest scam is very likely to be just another naff attempt to rip you off.

I can tell you now that Inner Sanctum does not possess the original masters for any of these tracks. Therefore recordings can only have been compiled from ripped retail products which in the past have included washed out cassettes and second hand vinyl served up as “digitally remastered”. We posses all the original masters here at Enid HQ.

Whatever may be the content of the claimed exclusive 2,000 word commentary on The Enid’s chequered history”, it has not been authorised by the band and could consist of almost anything.

So – If you do decide to buy this item from Inner Sanctum and it turns out not entirely to your satisfaction, send it back and demand a refund.

 

Yours as ever,

Robert John Godfrey